RTX Corporation Q2 2026: Revenue, Margins, and Risk
RTX Corporation posted 14.5% revenue growth and 31% operating income gains in Q2 2026. Here’s what the 10-Q reveals about margins, cash, and key risks.
RTX Corporation (RTX) reported second-quarter 2026 revenue of $24.71 billion, a 14.5% increase from the same period a year earlier, while operating income rose 31% — more than double the rate of top-line growth. The company’s 10-Q, filed July 23, 2026, reveals a cash position of $8.3 billion as of June 30, 2026, up 73.7% year over year, as RTX converts simultaneous tailwinds from a defense-spending supercycle and a commercial aerospace recovery into hard liquidity at a pace that outstrips revenue growth.
The Headline Numbers
RTX reported net sales of $24.71 billion for the quarter ending June 30, 2026, compared with $21.58 billion for the same period ending June 30, 2025. The 14.5% year-over-year increase is roughly double RTX’s historical mid-single-digit organic growth rate, and the company’s MD&A attributes the gain to organic net sales growth across all three operating segments — Collins Aerospace, Pratt & Whitney, and Raytheon — each contributing approximately equally to the $3.5 billion quarterly increase.
Profitability expanded at a faster pace than revenue. Operating income reached $2.81 billion, up 31% from $2.15 billion in Q2 2025. Net income climbed 29.1% to $2.14 billion, versus $1.66 billion in the year-ago period. Earnings per share rose from $1.22 to $1.57, a 28.7% increase. The fact that operating income growth ran at more than twice the rate of revenue growth confirms that margin, not just volume, is expanding.
Net products sales rose $2.4 billion in the quarter and net services sales rose $700 million, with aftermarket revenue identified as a meaningful driver at both Collins Aerospace and Pratt & Whitney. Long-term aftermarket service agreements at those two segments provide a degree of forward revenue visibility that pure original-equipment businesses do not carry.
What Changed: Segments, Margins, and Cost Lines
The MD&A credits approximately $500 million of organic segment profit improvement in the quarter as the primary driver of operating leverage. Two specific items in the year-over-year comparison are identified as favorable: the absence of a prior-year Pratt & Whitney customer bankruptcy charge, and lower restructuring costs in 2026 relative to 2025. Management characterizes both as tailwinds that inflate the comparison rather than purely durable gains, but the organic profit improvement is described as the more persistent component of the margin story.
Divestitures modestly reduced reported segment revenue. The filing notes that Collins Aerospace completed the sale of its actuation and flight control business and its Simmonds Precision business during the period, reducing reported net sales by approximately $400 million in the quarter and $800 million in the first half of 2026. Those transactions represent deliberate portfolio pruning and likely contributed to the period-end cash build rather than reflecting operational deterioration.
Raytheon, RTX’s defense electronics and munitions segment, follows a fiscal calendar rather than a standard calendar quarter, a modeling nuance the filing flags. Its contribution to the organic revenue gain was described as roughly equal to that of Collins and Pratt & Whitney, underscoring that the quarter’s performance is not a single-segment story.
On the Pratt & Whitney Powder Metal Matter — a 2023 disclosure involving a rare condition in powder metal used in certain PW1100G-JM Geared Turbofan engine parts requiring accelerated fleet inspections — the filing continues to carry the item under legal matters and contingencies. The MD&A excerpt does not provide updated financial estimates for the matter, but its continued disclosure signals it remains an active commitment.
Balance Sheet and Liquidity
Cash and equivalents stood at $8.3 billion as of June 30, 2026, versus $4.78 billion at the same point in 2025, a 73.7% year-over-year increase. For a company that has historically carried a cash balance in the $3 to $5 billion range, the current position represents a meaningful departure and implies that free cash flow generation is running ahead of capital return and debt service obligations in the near term.
Stockholders’ equity increased 6.4% year over year to $66.38 billion, compared with $62.4 billion at June 30, 2025. That equity base reflects the scale of RTX’s asset footprint following the Raytheon merger and provides a substantial cushion against near-term balance sheet stress.
The MD&A acknowledges that higher interest rates have increased the cost of borrowing and tightened capital availability broadly, but the filing contains no language suggesting those pressures are acute for RTX specifically. A detailed debt maturity schedule is not provided in the available MD&A excerpt, and the filing does not elaborate on credit facility availability beyond the general macroeconomic acknowledgment.
Risks and Disclosures
The most detailed risk treatment in the filing concerns tariffs. RTX paid approximately $500 million in tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) since their inception. In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that IEEPA tariffs were unauthorized, and the Court of International Trade subsequently ordered refunds. RTX submitted refund claims and had received an immaterial amount as of June 30, 2026. However, on June 2, 2026, the U.S. government appealed that order, and the filing states explicitly that “the precise basis and scope of this appeal is currently unknown.” That $500 million remains unresolved and is contingent on litigation outcome.
Management states that it does not believe announced tariffs “will have a material adverse effect upon our results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows,” but the filing follows that statement with three paragraphs enumerating seven factors that could cause actual costs to diverge from current estimates: the scope of goods covered, the value of imports subject to tariffs, the applicable rate, timing and duration, the recoverability of refunds, enforceability, and the ability of RTX and its suppliers to mitigate impacts. That level of specificity signals active scenario planning rather than a dismissive assessment.
Fixed-price contract exposure compounds the tariff concern. Management explicitly acknowledges that “increasing material, component, and labor prices could subject us to losses in our fixed price contracts in the event of cost overruns.” Unlike cost-plus contracts, fixed-price arrangements do not allow RTX to pass through unforeseen cost increases to government customers, meaning inflation or supply chain disruptions flow directly to margin.
Supply chain fragility is flagged as a continuing operational issue. Management states plainly that it “anticipates supply chain disruptions to continue,” citing shortages in rare earth elements, microelectronics, and certain commodities. The filing does not describe this as a near-term resolution scenario.
A separate disclosure references an executive order that “may limit corporate distributions, share repurchases, and executive compensation incentives during periods of defense contractor underperformance.” The filing does not specify the exact threshold or triggering mechanism, but the disclosure introduces a regulatory constraint on RTX’s capital return program that is contingent on contract execution quality.
The filing notes that no new or significantly escalated risk factors were introduced relative to the prior filing, but the tariff litigation, fixed-price exposure, and supply chain language collectively represent substantive operating-level risks embedded in the current quarter’s results.
What to Watch
The most time-sensitive item is the outcome of the U.S. government’s appeal of the IEEPA tariff refund order, which will determine whether the approximately $500 million RTX has already paid can be recovered. On the defense demand side, the filing references a proposed fiscal year 2027 defense budget of $1.5 trillion — comprising $1.15 trillion in base discretionary spending and $350 billion in mandatory reconciliation funding — along with a supplemental act signed July 4, 2025, that provides $156.2 billion to the Department of War for obligations through 2029, including $24.4 billion earmarked for the Golden Dome for America missile defense initiative. Management states that “RTX’s portfolio is well-positioned to deliver key solutions for the project,” while cautioning that a material financial impact will depend on actual contract awards, award timelines, and future budget determinations. The $25.4 billion in reconciliation funding directed at munitions and supply chain resiliency is also relevant given Raytheon’s position as a leading munitions manufacturer. Management’s tariff estimates are explicitly described as reflecting conditions “then in effect” as of June 30, 2026, signaling that forward quarters will require updated assessments as the regulatory environment evolves.